Benchmarking call_user_func_array()
Andreas Korthaus wrote the Savant mailing list recently with some interesting benchmark numbers on Savant3 and the output escaping routines. He wrote up a quick template script (in PHP of course) and used the Savant eprint() method 300+ times to escape output (which itself uses only htmlspecialchars() by default). Then he ran the script; the time to run was ...
Result: 161 ms
...
After that I looked at the cachegrind listings to find out
where some noticable time is lost. Looks like escaping costs a
lot of time, so I changed my templates not to use output
escaping:Result: 12 ms!!!
No, I did not forget a digit ;-)
...
So it seems the way escaping is implemented, hurts performance
very much!
That very dramatic difference in running times (14x!) looked mostly due to the fact that he wasn't using htmlspecialchars() on the echoed output. Then he changed all the "echo" to "echo htmlspecialchars()" and claimed only a 1.5ms difference. Followup emails from his continued benchmarking noted the slow-points in Savant were related primarily to call_user_func_array() calling the escaping functions, although the output escaping itself also adds running time.
All this piqued my interest to see the speed difference between using native functions, user-defined functions, objects, variable-functions, and the call_user_func[_array]() functions. For an experiment, I wrote a user-defined function ...
// mimics htmlentities() as a user-defined function
function html($value)
{
return htmlentities($value);
}
... and a user-defined class:
class example {
// mimics htmlentites() as a method
function html($value)
{
return htmlentities($value);
}
}
Then I wrote a script to make 100,000 calls to each of these:
- htmlentities($value)
- html($value)
- $func($value) where $func = 'html'
- $object->html($value) where $object = new example()
- $object->$func($value)
- call_user_func($func, $value)
- call_user_func(array($object, $func), $value)
- call_user_func_array($func, array($value))
- call_user_func_array(array($object, $func), array($value))
One set of representative results from my Mac Mini (PHP 5.1rc1), in seconds:
name : diff : description native : 0.614219 : htmlentities($value) literal_func : 0.745537 : html($value) variable_func : 0.826048 : $func($value) literal_method : 0.957708 : $object->html($value) variable_method : 0.840837 : $object->$func($value) call_func : 1.006599 : call_user_func($func, $value) call_object : 1.193323 : call_user_func((array($object, $func), $value) cufa_func : 1.232891 : call_user_func_array($func, array($value)) cufa_object : 1.309725 : call_user_func_array((array($object, $func), array($value)
Here's another one:
name : diff : total native : 0.772733 : 0.772733 literal_func : 0.737210 : 1.509943 variable_func : 0.807990 : 2.317933 literal_method : 0.820931 : 3.138864 variable_method : 0.821516 : 3.960380 call_func : 1.006845 : 4.967225 call_object : 1.210223 : 6.177448 cufa_func : 1.114493 : 7.291941 cufa_object : 1.307970 : 8.599911
And another, just for good measure:
name : diff : total native : 0.613295 : 0.613295 literal_func : 0.733299 : 1.346594 variable_func : 0.815782 : 2.162376 literal_method : 0.965143 : 3.127519 variable_method : 0.842771 : 3.970290 call_func : 1.023640 : 4.993930 call_object : 1.221747 : 6.215677 cufa_func : 1.104610 : 7.320287 cufa_object : 1.449468 : 8.769755
So native calls to htmlentities() are twice as fast as doing effectively the same thing via call_user_func() with an object method, and using call_user_func_array() is 10-20% slower than using call_user_func(). I hadn't realized the differences in speed of execution would be so distinct; of course, I never really thought about it before, either. Clearly PHP has to do a lot more work behind the scenes to map the variables to objects and parameters when using call_user_func_array().
You can download the very simple func_speed.php script here.
Um, you'll need Solar for it (sorry about that, I used the debug-timer object for the testing).